Vioxx Verdict

Staff Writer
Contributor
Posted by Staff WriterJuly 13, 2006 3:27 PM
Tags: None

Reuters reports a defense verdict in a trial involving Vioxx. According to the report, the seven member jury found adequate warnings provided to the prescribing physician--but inadequate warnings to the plaintiff. Ultimately, it seems, the jury found that the plaintiff--68 years old--would have suffered a heart attack with or without Vioxx.

0 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Boston

InjuryBoard Boston RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Boston is brought to you by Steven H. Schafer & Associates

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Steven H. Schafer & Associates (866) 735-1102 Ext 825 schaferlaw.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Boston, Worcester, Cambridge, Lowell, Dedham, Salem, Lawrence, Brockton, Plymouth, Taunton, Fall River, New Bedford, MetroWest, Newton, Needham, Wellesley, Natick, Framingham, Waltham
141 Tremont StreetSixth Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02111 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address