The Voir Dire Debate

Ken Margolin
Ken Margolin
Contributor
Posted by Ken MargolinNovember 08, 2006 7:00 AM

Voir dire is the process whereby potential jurors are questioned before they are selected, to probe for biases that might impair their ability to impartially judge the facts. Voir dire has been described in a "Law Day" outline of the American Bar Association, as "one of the most important aspects of any trial." Massachusetts is one of only a few states in the country in which voir dire is not conducted by the attorneys.

Attorney-conducted voir dire is an important trial skill. A seasoned attorney not only attempts to discover bias, but also to give the potential jurors an overview of the attorney's case. This must be done subtly, since overt argument is not permitted. The attorney also has the opportunity to gain a rapport with his future jurors, before the formality of the trial itself. The importance of voir dire becomes apparent in cases such as medical malpractice or products liability cases, in light of the decade-long campaign of business and medical professional lobbies to convince people that these cases are bad for the economy and the country.

While Massachusetts attorneys can recommend questions for the judge to ask the jurors, the judge retains discretion over what questions to ask and how to word them. Voir dire by most judges tend to be dry and perfunctory affairs. Most jurors, when asked, "are you biased against medical malpractice plaintiffs?" will answer, "no," regardless of their true beliefs. When attorneys can engage in a more thorough and less direct dialogue, bias is more likely to be uncovered. Unfortunately, most Massachusetts judges opposed attorney voir dire. Whether their motive is control or the often stated rationale that too much time will be consumed by the process, is unclear. While most trial attorneys would like the ability to conduct voir dire themselves, change in Massachusetts is unlikely any time soon, as Massachusetts' budget for the judiciary is inadequate. When courts struggle to keep up with existing caseloads, changes that add process are usually not high on anyone's list.

0 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Boston

InjuryBoard Boston RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Boston is brought to you by Steven H. Schafer & Associates

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Steven H. Schafer & Associates (866) 735-1102 Ext 825 schaferlaw.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Boston, Worcester, Cambridge, Lowell, Dedham, Salem, Lawrence, Brockton, Plymouth, Taunton, Fall River, New Bedford, MetroWest, Newton, Needham, Wellesley, Natick, Framingham, Waltham
141 Tremont StreetSixth Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02111 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address